A Kadir Jasin: The National Film Development Corporation (Finas) Act 1981 was drafted to regulate the film industry, not social media…


Lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla pointed out that the National Film Development Corporation (Finas) Act 1981 was drafted to regulate the film industry, not social media.

This was in response to Communications and Multimedia Minister Saifuddin Abdullah, who told the Dewan Rakyat today it is mandatory for “mainstream and personal” media to have a Finas licence to publish work on “social media and traditional channels”.

In a statement addressed to the minister today, Haniff (photo, above) noted that the preamble of the Finas Act stipulated that it was to specifically help develop the Malaysian film industry.

The preamble reads: An Act to promote, nurture, and facilitate the development of the film industry of Malaysia, to establish the Perbadanan Kemajuan Filem Nasional Malaysia, and to provide for matters necessary therefor, connected therewith, or incidental thereto.

“The purpose and objective of the Act is to oversee and regulate the film industry including producers, distributors, and broadcasters of film works including films, advertisements, and documentaries at the time (when it was drafted), which was in 1981,” Haniff said.

As for social media, the lawyer said the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA) was specifically drafted for online spaces.

Once again, he pointed to the preamble: An Act to provide for, and to regulate, the converging communications and multimedia industries, and for incidental matters.

“Saifuddin should not err in extending the meaning and purpose of the Finas licence, while mandatory for the film industry under the Finas Act, to the extent it interferes with the jurisdiction of the CMA,” he contended.

Haniff elaborated that the CMA is responsible for regulating multimedia systems including personal communications like personal video recordings and personal entertainment activities like Instagram and TikTok.

He further argued that compelling individuals to apply for a Finas licence for personal communications and multimedia use was the “wrong way to control rights to speech”.

“This is a basic right enshrined by Article 10 of the Federal Constitution,” he added.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s