Did Coronavirus escape from a Wuhan lab? The speculation gains momentum!




Did coronavirus originate in Chinese government laboratory? Scientists believe killer disease may have begun in research facility 300 yards from Wuhan wet fish market

  • Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology concludes that ‘the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan’
  • It points to research on bats and respiratory diseases carried by the animals at  the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute of Virology
  • WCDC is just 300 yards from the seafood market and is adjacent to the hospital


PUBLISHED: 13:22 GMT, 16 February 2020 | UPDATED: 16:00 GMT, 16 February 2020

Chinese scientists believe the deadly coronavirus may have started life in a research facility just 300 yards from the Wuhan fish market.

A new bombshell paper from the Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology says that the Wuhan Center for Disease Control (WHCDC) could have spawned the contagion in Hubei province.

‘The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus,’ penned by scholars Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao claims the WHCDC kept disease-ridden animals in laboratories, including 605 bats. 

It also mentions that bats – which are linked to coronavirus – once attacked a researcher and ‘blood of bat was on his skin.’

The report says: ‘Genome sequences from patients were 96% or 89% identical to the Bat CoV ZC45 coronavirus originally found in Rhinolophus affinis (intermediate horseshoe bat).’ 

It describes how the only native bats are found around 600 miles away from the Wuhan seafood market and that the probability of bats flying from Yunnan and Zhejiang provinces was minimal.

In addition there is little to suggest the local populace eat the bats as evidenced by testimonies of 31 residents and 28 visitors. 

Instead the authors point to research being carried out withing a few hundred yards at the WHCDC.

One of the researchers at the WHCDC described quarantining himself for two weeks after a bat’s blood got on his skin, according to the report. That same man also quarantined himself after a bat urinated on him.'The WHCDC was also adjacent to the Union Hospital (Figure 1, bottom) where the first group of doctors were infected during this epidemic.' The report says.+4

‘The WHCDC was also adjacent to the Union Hospital (Figure 1, bottom) where the first group of doctors were infected during this epidemic.’ The report says.

For more: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8009669/Did-coronavirus-originate-Chinese-government-laboratory.html?ito=social-twitter_mailonline


Coronavirus bombshell: ‘REAL cause’ of outbreak claim – Chinese scientists break cover

CORONAVIRUS spread from a science laboratory in Wuhan and not a ‘wet market’, a group of Chinese scientists have sensationally claimed.

By Brian McGleenon PUBLISHED: 00:17, Sun, Feb 16, 2020 | UPDATED: 00:18, Sun, Feb 16, 2020

They said scientists researching bat diseases could be responsible for the global outbreak, in a bombshell report published this week. Their report details how sick bats urinated, attacked and bled on researchers, who did their best to quarantine themselves. But the disease still spread through Wuhan, across China and throughout the world.

The new report by biological scientists from the prestigious South China University of Technology in Guangzhou, China, contradicts Beijing, who said it spread from contaminated bats being sold at a food market.

Biologists Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao, published a pre-print entitled “The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus”, in the report they described how “the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan”.

The report added: “We noted two laboratories conducting research on bat coronavirus in Wuhan, one of which was only 280 metres from the seafood market.

“We briefly examined the histories of the laboratories and proposed that the coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory

A Wuhan high security laboratory

A Wuhan high security laboratory (Image: GETTY)

“Our proposal provided an alternative origin of the coronavirus in addition to natural recombination and intermediate host.”

The scientists in the alarming report contested official findings that the pathogen first made the jump from bats to humans in the Wuhan wet market.

They said: “The probability was very low for the bats to fly to the market.

“According to municipal reports and the testimonies of 31 residents and 28 visitors, the bat was never a food source in the city, and no bat was traded in the market.

“There was possible natural recombination or intermediate host of the coronavirus, yet little proof has been reported.”

The researchers screened the area around the seafood market and identified two laboratories conducting research on bat coronavirus.

These laboratories were within 280 meters of the market, one is called the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

The research concludes that this laboratory hosted animals for research purposes, one of which was specialised in pathogens collection and identification.





Was this coronavirus PATIENT ZERO? Scientist describes gruesome bat attack at Chinese lab

CORONAVIRUS ‘patient zero’ may have been a worker from a high security pathogen laboratory working with coronavirus infected bats, Chinese researchers have claimed.

By BRIAN MCGLEENONPUBLISHED: 11:10, Sun, Feb 16, 2020 | UPDATED: 12:12, Sun, Feb 16, 2020

A research paper released by biologists Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao points to a bloody incident at the Wuhan Centre for Disease control laboratory, WCDC, less than one mile from the disease epicentre at Wuhan fish market. Entitled ‘The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus’ the paper said: “A researcher described that he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin. He knew the extreme danger of the infection so he quarantined himself for 14 days.

In another accident, he quarantined himself again because bats urinated on him.”

The scientists from the prestigious South China University of Technology in Guangzhou claimed the Wuhan WCDC “hosted animals in laboratories for research purposes”, including 605 bats captured in nearby provinces.

As well as the Wuhan food market, the lab is also located near the Union hospital where a group of doctors were among the first to become infected.

The paper states: “The Chinese horseshoe bats were natural reservoirs for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV, which caused the SARS outbreak in 2003.”

A high security level 4 biosafety lab

A high security level 4 biosafety lab (Image: GETTY)

The many virologists conform to a different scenario, based on genetic analysis, that the virus was transmitted by a bat to another mammal between 20-70 years ago.

This intermediary animal, not yet identified, then passed it on to its first human host in the city of Wuhan in late November or early December 2019.

The Wuhan Institute Of Virology, we report the findings of our 5-year surveillance of SARSr-CoVs in a cave inhabited by multiple species of horseshoe bats in Yunnan Province, China

 A paper released by Xinglou Yang of the Wuhan Institute Of Virology described, “length genome sequences were obtained from five patients at the early stage of the outbreak. They are almost identical to each other and share 79.5% sequence identify to SARS-CoV. Furthermore, it was found that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s