You could presume extradition to Mainland China from Hong Kong for those charged with 1 treason; 2 separatism; 3 armed rebellion, riot; 4 collaborating with the enemy; and you might be right.

..

..

Excerpts:

Tam Yiu-chung, the city’s sole delegate on the National People’s Congress Standing Committee says Beijing has jurisdiction in certain instances.

Cases involving foreign interference could see people sent across border to stand trial.

Jeffie Lam , Sum Lok-kei and Gary Cheung

Published: 3:20pm, 17 Jun, 2020
Updated: 4:12pm, 17 Jun, 2020

Hongkongers who breach the new national security law Beijing is tailor-making for the city, particularly in cases involving foreign interference, could be extradited to mainland China for trial, according to the city’s sole delegate to the country’s top legislative body.

The suggestion on Wednesday from Tam Yiu-chung, who sits on the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPSC), was a further elaboration of a statement by Deng Zhonghua, deputy director of the cabinet-level Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, that Beijing could reserve jurisdiction over cases “in very special circumstances” when applying the new legislation.

This came as Yue Zhongming, spokesman for the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPCSC, which is preparing the new law against acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and foreign interference in the city’s affairs, said the apex body would “speed up” its formulation.

On Wednesday, Tam said extradition could be an option and the central government “had the right to do so”.

He added: “If Beijing found it necessary that the case should not be handled by Hong Kong courts, [extradition] could be an option.”

Tam said the exceptional cases which Deng was referring to were those related to defence and foreign affairs, over which Hong Kong courts have no jurisdiction, according to the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution.

“I believe some cases would touch on foreign affairs given the proposed law would regulate the foreign forces that have meddled in Hong Kong affairs,” he said. “This is clearly a matter that needs to be handled by the central government.”
–

But unlike the extradition bill, Wu said the new law “brought mainland’s rule by law system” to Hong Kong.
–

Although the new law appears to have not sparked the large-scale protests the extradition bill did, Wu said Hong Kong residents had taken other action, such as emigrating and moving their money out of the city.

Gary Chan Hak-kan, vice-chairman of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, said he hoped most of the cases arising from the new law would be tried locally in a special court, but sending some “very special” cases to the mainland “had to be considered”.

Chan also said the arrangement was different from the extradition bill, which dealt with a greater variety of crimes.

“The national security law has a very narrow scope, targeting only four types of people,” Chan said.

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3089386/breaking-hong-kong-national-security-law-could-get?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_content=article&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1592379954

..