..
What does the Lund University study tell us about Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and human DNA? *The study didn’t show reverse-transcribed DNA entering the nucleus. It also didn’t show that the DNA was integrated into the cell’s genome.
..
..
New Study: mRNA Vaccines Alter Human Liver DNA In Vitro?
“Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects,” the authors warn.
The study, authored by a team of Swedish researchers at Lund University, concluded that Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine entered the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro and BNT162b2 mRNA was subsequently transcribed intracellularly into DNA within six hours of exposure.
.
A recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells, which the authors said led them to investigate whether spike transfected by mRNA vaccines might have comparable effects.
..
Dr Susan Oliver: mRNA vaccines do NOT combine with DNA in human liver cells
A number of people are claiming that a new paper entitled Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line is evidence that mRNA vaccines combine with human DNA. Dr Susan Oliver and Julie the dog go back to the science, and demonstrate that the paper does not show this at all. The study used a ridiculously high dosage of mRNA, used cancer cells (Huh7) instead of normal cells, and didn’t even show that mRNA from the vaccine was incorporated into human DNA.
..
SOURCE: Meiling Lee, Epoch Times, 1 Mar. 2022
CLAIM
COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is converted to DNA and enters the cell’s nucleus, so the vaccines can potentially change our DNA
DETAILS
Factually inaccurate: The study didn’t show reverse-transcribed DNA entering the nucleus. It also didn’t show that the DNA was integrated into the cell’s genome.
Unsupported: The experimental system used in the Lund University study is artificial. For example, it used liver cancer cells growing in the laboratory, which aren’t representative of healthy cells or a human being, to study whether the vaccine mRNA was reverse-transcribed. The study’s results therefore cannot be extrapolated to people.
.
What made the study by Zhang et al. controversial was the fact that other scientists weren’t able to reproduce the results[3]. In a letter to PNAS[4], another group of scientists questioned the conclusions of the study by Zhang et al., highlighting several flaws in the experiment, suggesting that the study’s findings were likely due to experimental artifacts rather than a genuine phenomenon. The letter called for caution in the interpretation of the study:
“Given the inappropriate interpretation of high-throughput sequencing methods and improper experimental design by the authors, we ask for restraint about the conclusions presented by the study. It remains unlikely that retrotranscription and integration of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in patients happens at any notable frequency, or even at all.”
.
The study didn’t show that reverse-transcribed DNA entered the nucleus; its experimental system is artificial and not representative of normal cells
The claim that the study showed that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines change our DNA or enter the nucleus is inaccurate and fails to understand the study’s findings.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/study-lund-university-didnt-show-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-change-dna-epoch-times/
..
..
https://www.techarp.com/science/pfizer-mrna-vaccine-dna-facts/?amp=1
..
..
weehingthong 