High Court allows application by prosecution to impeach Rosmah over allegedly contradictory statements


High Court allows application by prosecution to impeach Rosmah over allegedly contradictory statements

Thursday, 21 Oct 2021 03:41 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 21 — The High Court here today has allowed the application by the prosecution in Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor’s corruption case for her to be impeached over an allegedly contradictory statement.

Prior to today’s hearing, the prosecution had applied to the court to cross-examine Rosmah over her alleged contradictory statement that she had made to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in relation to a money-laundering investigation under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001.

The prosecution had intended to challenge Rosmah’s credibility by using the aforementioned statement that she had given to the MACC which allegedly contradicts the statement that she had made in court during this trial.

In his ruling, High Court Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan said Rosmah’s statement to the MACC was admissible as evidence and can be used by the prosecution to impeach the accused.

“The pertinent issue is whether the accused statement is made under Section 32 of the AMLA Act 2001 — whether it can be admitted as evidence and subsequently used by the prosecution to impeach her.  

“I am of the view that the statement is admissible pursuant to Section 40 of the same Act, and that the prosecution could proceed with its attempt to impeach the accused.

“I am however of the belief that the provision for impeachment is to be carried out under Sec 145 and 155 of the Evidence Act 1950, and not Section 72 of the AMLA Act, as the latter pertains to a trial of an offence under the Act, which is not the case here,” he said.

Concurrently, Rosmah is also charged with 17 charges of money laundering under the AMLA Act, with over RM7.1 million allegedly transferred to her personal bank account between 2013 and 2017.

The prosecution had also applied to question Rosmah’s character, particularly on her AMLA charges and personal bank statements, to show inconsistencies in her evidence in this trial.

The prosecution had further argued that the need to question Rosmah’s character was pertinent after the defence had attacked the character of several prosecution witnesses, namely former education minister Datuk Seri Mahdzir Khalid, former Education Ministry secretary-general Tan Sri Madinah Mohamad and former aide Datuk Rizal Mansor.

In this application, Zaini also allowed the prosecution to cross-examine Rosmah on her character; however, confined the line of questioning to not include case facts in her AMLA charges, such as her bank statements and alleged deposits made by one Roslan Suhari into her bank account to prevent prejudice.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s