..
I used to absolutely love ZDogg's videos. Probably watched & shared hundreds of times in my residency.
— Nick Mark MD (@nickmmark) February 27, 2022
Sadly he descended into a weird anti-vaxx contrarianism. Ultimately he made false claims about a science museum's policies & deleted his Twitter account. Good riddance. pic.twitter.com/J8FbWuh3F8
Enjoy your IVM commentary but u have not done your homework. ZDoggMD does not fit neatly into any political or Covid-sub tribe (i.e., your sub tribe).
— Brent Carpenter (@BrentCa24718741) February 27, 2022
Paul Offit has been on his podcast repeatedly — and Offit does not appear with vax “contrarians.”https://t.co/Duvlv3hOYl
I used to love his videos. Very sad, and strange devolution.
— DL Coker 🇺🇦🌻☮️🏳️🌈😷💉 (@oakbendgirl) February 27, 2022
(he prob considers 12+ to be a kid, no? and discussing tradeoffs and risks while maintaining that the vaccines are great on-balance is a wild set of grounds for calling someone anti-vax. come on)
— David Rasho (@David_Rasho) February 27, 2022
as long as you hold everyone's tweets to that high standard, then sure.
— David Rasho (@David_Rasho) February 27, 2022
The Cal Academy of Sciences is given the charity to elaborate on its position on its website (which says at least one of Z's children must be boosted) but others are not. Charity only to those who agree with you is just partisanship. pic.twitter.com/U4PfNeR3yT
— Michael Sharma, PA-C ⚕️🎙️ (@michaelsharmapa) February 27, 2022
Hope the community offers more charity and less piling on for when each of us makes a public mis-step in the future. Some of us talk a real big game of compassion for all the mean girl vibes we give off. But the mob comes for us all. Just ask Drs. Choo and Winter.
— Michael Sharma, PA-C ⚕️🎙️ (@michaelsharmapa) February 27, 2022
..
weehingthong 