Latest wumao trick: Take a 2019 speech by Macron, doctor it and pass it off as an October 2021 speech to rubbish the West and Europe, and praise China and Russia (which are now “good friends”)


This is Macron’s speech in 2019:



This is the doctored version of Macron’s speech:

President of France ~ Macron:
U.S. and Western hegemony ~ the end is near!
/ (Macron) I must admit:
The U.S. and Western hegemony may be nearing an end…
Today ~ (2021/10/15)!

The internal speeches of the French president flowed out, and the world was shocked!
Wenzheng Video At an internal meeting a week ago (transferred by C.lms), Macron made a general analysis of the current international situation, and he sighed: “Western hegemony is near the end!”
How to treat the great shift of power in the world today? Macron’s closed-door speech was extremely rich in gold.

We live in this world together, and the envoys here understand this world better than I do.
Yes, the international order is being subverted in a brand new way, and I am sure that this is a major subversion that we have experienced in history, and it has a profound impact in almost all regions.
It is a transformation of the international order, a geopolitical integration, and even more a strategic reorganization.
Yes, I must admit that Western hegemony may be nearing an end.
We have become accustomed to an international order based on Western hegemony since the 18th century.
This is a France inspired by the Enlightenment in the 18th century.
This is a United Kingdom that was led by the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century.
This is a United States that emerged from the two world wars in the 20th century.
France, Britain, and the United States have made the West great for 300 years.
France is culture, Britain is industry, and America is war.

We are used to this greatness, which gives us absolute control over the global economy and politics.
But things are changing.
Some crises come from our own mistakes in Western countries, and some come from challenges in emerging countries.
Within Western countries, the United States has made many mistakes in the face of crises, which have deeply shaken our hegemony.
Note that this didn’t just start with the Trump administration. Before Trump, other US presidents also made other wrong choices, Clinton’s China policy, Bush’s war policy, Obama’s world financial crisis and quantification. Loose policy.
The wrong policies of these American leaders are all fundamental mistakes that have shaken Western hegemony. However, on the other hand, we have greatly underestimated the rise of emerging powers.
The underestimation of the rise of these emerging powers did not begin in the past two years, but as early as ten or twenty years ago.
We underestimated them from the beginning

We must admit that China and Russia have achieved great success in these years under different leadership styles.
India is also rapidly emerging as an economic power, and at the same time it is also becoming a political power, China, Russia, India, these countries compare the United States, France and the United Kingdom.
Let’s not talk about anything else. Their political imagination alone is far stronger than today’s Westerners. After they have strong economic power, they begin to look for their own “philosophies and culture.”
They no longer believe in Western politics, but began to pursue their own “national culture.” This has nothing to do with democracy. India is a democratic country, and he is doing the same, looking for his own “national culture.”
When these emerging countries find their own national culture and begin to firmly believe in it, they will gradually get rid of the “philosophical culture” that Western hegemony instilled in them in the past.
And this is the beginning of the end of Western hegemony.
The end of Western hegemony lies not in economic decline, nor in military decline, but in cultural decline.

When your values ​​can no longer be exported to emerging countries, that is the beginning of your decline.
I think the political imagination of these emerging countries is higher than ours.
Political imagination is very important. It has a strong cohesive connotation and can elicit more political inspiration.
Politically, can we be bolder. The political imagination of emerging countries far exceeds that of Europeans today. All this deeply shocked me.
China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty, and more people will be lifted out of poverty in the future, but in France, the market economy is increasing income inequality at an unprecedented rate.
The anger of the middle class in the past year has caused profound changes in the French political order. Since the 19th century, the lives of French people have been in a balance.
Personal freedom, democracy, and a wealthy middle class are the tripods for balancing French politics, but when the middle class is no longer the cornerstone of our country, a crisis is born when the middle class thinks that its own interests have been harmed. .

They will have fundamental doubts about democracy and the market system. Can such a system still give me a better life?
They have the right to be so skeptical, and they also have the right to join a radical political movement.
In Britain, the fall of the political system is even more obvious.
The resounding slogan of Brexit, Take back control, speaks for itself.
The people believe that their own destiny is no longer in their own hands, so they must “take back control.”
The direct way to “take back control” is to leave the European Union. They hate the European Union and the old-fashioned politics. They want something more politically imaginative.
In the final analysis, the past political system failed to benefit the British, and even made their lives worse and worse, but the upper-level political leaders did not realize this.
So they failed.
As for the United States, although Americans belong to the Western camp, they have always had different humanitarian standards (implying religion) from Europe.

Americans are not sensitive to climate issues, equality, and social balance in the same way as Europe (implying that the gap between rich and poor in the United States is much larger than in Europe).
There is a clear gap between American civilization and European civilization. Even though the United States and Europe are deeply aligned, our differences have always existed.
Trump’s coming to power only amplifies the original difference.
I must emphasize that Europe is different from the United States.
Of course, the European civilization plan cannot be determined by Hungarian Catholics or Russian Orthodox Christians. However, Europe has followed the United States for a long time and expelled Russia from the European continent. Such a policy is not necessarily correct.
The United States needs to make “Russia and Europe antagonistic”, but does Europe need it?

Europe cooperates with the United States to expel Russia. This may be Europe’s biggest geopolitical error in the 21st century.
The result of expelling Russia is that Putin has no choice but to embrace China, and this just gives China and Russia a chance to stay together.
Let one of our competitors combine with another to create a huge trouble. This is what the Americans do.
If Europe does not expel Russia, Russia’s policies will never be so anti-Western. Now, in terms of geopolitics, it is impossible to give so much help to the great eastern countries.
But the problem in Europe lies in the military.
Because of the existence of NATO, it has become very difficult for Europe to form another European army. As long as the “European Army” does not exist, Europe will be controlled by the political orders of the United States.

Sadly, when I talked about this with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, we were all pessimistic. At present, no one in Europe has the ability to form a European army, let alone this major strategic policy. , Give investment.
However, the European military is the key to counterbalance the United States. Without the European military, Europe would not have true independence at all.
Yes, the United States is an ally and our long-term ally, but at the same time, he is also an ally who has kidnapped us for a long time.

France is a powerful diplomatic power, a permanent member of the Security Council, and the heart of the European Union.
Leaving Russia from Europe may be an absolutely far-reaching strategic error.
If France cannot bring Russia back to Europe, it will not continue to participate in the policy of increasing tensions and isolating Russia.
At present, Russia and that big eastern country have no interest in forming an alliance, but no one is sure if the Western world presses on.
Will China and Russia say so with certainty that we will not form an alliance.
Is the enemy of our friend necessarily our enemy?
Russia is an enemy of the United States, so must he be an enemy of Europe?
We need to establish Europe’s own new trust and security architecture, because if we cannot ease relations with Russia, there will be no peace on the European continent.

The Americans say that this country that has invested heavily in weapons and equipment has a declining demographic structure and an aging country.

The Americans asked me, should we be afraid of this country? Should we reconcile with such a country?

I asked the Americans, how about swapping the positions of Russia and Canada?
In addition to economic turmoil and geopolitical turmoil, the third major turmoil we are now experiencing is undoubtedly the turmoil of the technological revolution.

When big data Internet, social media, artificial intelligence, and big intelligence spread in globalization, the advancement of information technology is developing at an unprecedented speed.
One of the problems brought about by intelligent globalization is the globalization of emotions, violence, and even hatred.
The technological revolution has brought us profound anthropological changes, and has also created a brand-new space for us, a space that requires humans to re-examine and formulate rules.

This is a new technological rule space that has not been touched in the world at present, and it is also a rule of the Internet international order that everyone should recognize and participate in.
But before this new set of rules is fully established, the new technological revolution has brought us not only economic imbalances, but also anthropological class and ideological contradictions.
In the end, it will bring heavy tears and instability to the democracy we are proud of.

All the envoys here can see economic turmoil, geopolitical turmoil, information technology turmoil, and democratic turmoil.
All these upheavals happen at the same time, but what should we do?
What do we need to do now? Do we continue to be an audience, a commentator, or to take on the responsibilities that we must bear?
But one thing is certain is that if we all lose our political imagination and let the habits of the past decades or even hundreds of years dominate our strategy, then we…
A president of the Republic, a minister, a diplomat, and a soldier, if everyone in this room continues to do the same in the past.
What is certain is that we will definitely “out of control.”
And after “losing control”, what awaits us is disappearing.
Civilization gradually disappears, Europe gradually disappears, and the moment of Western hegemony will disappear with it.

Ultimately, the world will revolve around two extremes: the United States and China, and Europe will have to choose between these two rulers.
Europe will completely lose control, so I only believe in one thing so far, and that is courage-the political strategy of daring to break through and take risks.
This political strategy, which is different from the old European political strategy, will cause many things to fail now, and there are also a large number of commentators in China, and critics say it will not succeed.
But what is fatal is not to comment and criticize, but to lose the “brave heart” and “imaginative thinking”, and I think that only by trying some brave and imaginative politics can the French national spirit be deeply reflected. The best way.
Only France can re-establish a profound European civilization; only France can consider the survival of Europe from the height of European strategy and international politics.
The French spirit is a tenacious spirit of resistance and the spirit of pursuing a unique world. The spirit of resistance will never succumb to the inevitability and adaptability of affairs
This extraordinary spirit, which is implemented in the soul of the French, has shaped the historical trend that only France can change Europe’s gradual engulfing of “two poles.”

Next, France will have several important agenda directions. The first is the “Eurasian Agenda.”
France will promote a better integration of China’s new Silk Road and European connectivity strategy, but the integration must be carried out in respect of our sovereignty and rules.
Ten years ago, we made some mistakes in the integration of Europe and Asia. In dealing with that major financial crisis, Europe was forced to carry out privatization in order to obtain assistance to reduce part of Europe’s sovereignty.
From Italy in the south to Britain in the north, we will not blame the smart Chinese, we can only blame ourselves for being stupid.

In addition, when facing the rise of China, France must also establish a “French strategy” with the United States in the Indo-Pacific region.
This is a “supplement” to France’s strategy of welcoming China’s Silk Road.

We helped the opponent in one place, then we must check and balance it elsewhere. This is a consistent way of playing politics.
France must establish “French influence” in the Indo-Pacific region to balance the rise of China’s power in the region. After all, France has a million residents in the region and nearly 10,000 fighters.
France wants to become one of the main maritime powers in this sea area.
France’s second important agenda is to give priority to the establishment of European sovereignty.
I have talked with many people. European sovereignty is by no means an empty word, but we have already made the mistake of leaving sovereignty’s right to speak to nationalists.
Nationalists never represent our sovereignty. Sovereignty is a good word. He represents the core of our democracy. But if the government loses control of everything, then sovereignty will also have nothing.
So nationalists have the right to express their voices, but they never represent European sovereignty.
For decades, Europe has built a strong and friendly market, but at the same time we are also the most open and naive market.
Moreover, when we discuss European sovereignty, we must also include the United Kingdom very deeply. Regardless of the final outcome of Brexit, European sovereignty includes the United Kingdom.
The other direction of European sovereignty is national defense. Regarding the issue of European defense, there has been no progress since the 1950s, and it is even forbidden to discuss it.
But it is time to establish an initiative with more national defense sovereignty, relying on European funds and the European military.
I think it is now the best time to discuss “European national defense sovereignty.” This is the best time for decades. This requires all the envoys present here to work harder.
Another focus of European sovereignty is Europe’s thinking on borders. This issue will also extend to the topic of population and immigration.
Europe has experienced an unprecedented immigration crisis since 2015. We must abandon the emergency management system for refugees and establish a sustainable talent landing mechanism.
We should cooperate with the International Organization for Migration to resume the immigration filtering work we did in Paris.

The last part is about economic and financial sovereignty.
We are now actively talking about Iran and continue to defend our Iranian agenda.
But the U.S. dollar has its “speciality”. Even if we decide to protect Iran, our company must rely on the U.S. dollar if it wants to move forward.
Note that I am not saying that we must fight the US dollar, but that we need to establish a real “Euro sovereignty.”
But this process is too slow, and our progress is too slow!
And in establishing digital currency sovereignty, Europe also needs to rethink, because digital currency will surely affect future economic sovereignty.
The reconstruction of European sovereignty, economic sovereignty, national defense sovereignty, and border sovereignty is the only way to truly strengthen European integration without interference from other countries.
Ladies and gentlemen, let us have a strong and consistent diplomacy. At a time when Western hegemony is being challenged, we should give full play to our own political imagination.
Take control of the Europeans’ own destiny and return control to our people.
I rely on you to play an important role in diplomacy, and I am grateful for these requests.

I will always be by your side so that France can be at the core of leading a series of important political issues.
This enables our envoys to have a strong representative power all over the world to defend our national interests, surpass our national interests, and let our values ​​spread throughout the world.
Long live the Republic, long live France!


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Latest wumao trick: Take a 2019 speech by Macron, doctor it and pass it off as an October 2021 speech to rubbish the West and Europe, and praise China and Russia (which are now “good friends”)

  1. Sino Javanicus says:

    Good service you are doing to dispel hoaxes and conspiracy theories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s