..
The new WHO SAGO is imbalanced: 6 are from the existing origins China-WHO team who ruled that Covid-19 was more likely than a lab origin; 1 signed both infamous Lancet letters condemning/dismissing lab origin
..
..
..
..
The new WHO SAGO is imbalanced: 6 are from the existing origins China-WHO team who ruled that Covid-19 was more likely than a lab origin; 1 signed both infamous Lancet letters condemning/dismissing lab origin
..
..
The new @WHO SAGO is imbalanced #OriginsOfCovid
— Alina Chan (@Ayjchan) October 13, 2021
6 are from the existing origins China-WHO team who ruled #PopsicleOrigins as more likely than a lab origin.
Another 1 signed both infamous Lancet letters condemning/dismissing lab origin #PoorJudgmenthttps://t.co/AzrgvR54TK
If observers who can help hold an imbalanced SAGO committee accountable are not appointed, it will be difficult to inspire a perception of credibility and objectivity in any future WHO-convened investigation or study of the #OriginsOfCovid
— Alina Chan (@Ayjchan) October 13, 2021
Even worse, another one is a subcontractor on a multimillion-dollar current NIH grant to EcoHealth Alliance, budgeted to receive a $1.07 million subcontract from in 2020-2025.
— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 13, 2021
..