..
And we're in agreement: SARS-2 coronavirus has natural origins, was not produced through GOF research, and probably has nothing to do with the Wuhan Institute of VIrology https://t.co/ADnRigr8qP
— Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD (@PeterHotez) June 28, 2021
..
.
This is a huge story. An Australian virologist at WIV in late 2019 notes:
— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) June 27, 2021
-no sick employees at WIV
-best-practice biosafety protocols in place
-did not witness GoF work which she's qualified to recognize
Lab leak odds just got even longer.https://t.co/LKrQe9H3N2
And why is she just speaking out now? Well… pic.twitter.com/rpnvjn83zn
— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) June 27, 2021
I don't. I think it's very clear the 1977 H1N1 pandemic occurred because of humans, but it was not a lab accident in the sense that oops, I was working with flu and got infected. And that's not something a virologist would necessarily know from just looking at the data.
— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) June 27, 2021
Agreed but I think it's hard to tell what exactly that means. Does that mean 45 hours of training total or 45 hours of supervised training in containment. Certainly requiring a demonstration of knowledge prior to allowing unsupervised entry is consistent with best practices.
— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) June 28, 2021
..
The last foreign scientist left the Wuhan Institute of Virology in November 2019—just before the pandemic. For the first time, she shares her story on the now infamous lab https://t.co/7EEkRstrET via @business
— Michelle Fay Cortez (@FayCortez) June 27, 2021
The only way we'll get to the bottom of what happened is to listen to scientists like Anderson and follow the path where it leads us. The vitriol against those putting themselves in harm's way – wherever they are – is appalling. Thanks to @jwgale for making this story happen.
— Michelle Fay Cortez (@FayCortez) June 27, 2021
..
..
weehingthong 