… Blanche asked for a redacted letter to be made public & that it be weighed in support of Trump’s pending motion to dismiss. But due to time constraints & privacy issues, he asked that it *not* be explored through “invasive fact-finding.” …
2/8 pic.twitter.com/vpN6EVIQW1

— Roger Parloff (@rparloff) December 18, 2024

… DANY argued that without sworn accusations, NY law required dismissal of the claim. It asked to keep Trump attys' 12/3 letter under seal or redact in way that shows that the juror refused to endorse Trump counsel’s summary. Full DANY letter: https://t.co/tj1yqSjxHt …
4/8 pic.twitter.com/kwYvLR1FQa

— Roger Parloff (@rparloff) December 18, 2024

… On 12/9 DANY, wrote that it was proving difficult to redact an acceptable version of Blanche’s 12/3 letter, and DANY and Trump couldn’t agree on how to redact DANY’s 12/5 reply. Full letter: https://t.co/jxOuoufHpv
6/8 pic.twitter.com/EShrMPIJIQ

— Roger Parloff (@rparloff) December 18, 2024

… And that’s where this stands—and might end. Justice Merchan’s last word on this was in his 12/16 order, stating that he “cannot allow the filing of unsworn, and admittedly contested statements.”
8/8-end pic.twitter.com/NSAYkDr9bF

— Roger Parloff (@rparloff) December 18, 2024