Wan Azizah wins the Permatang Pauh Parliamentary seat vacated by Anwar Ibrahim
22 November 2017
KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 22 — PKR’s Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today filed a lawsuit challenging the Election Commission’s (EC) redelineation of the Permatang Pauh federal seat due to an alleged breach of his rights as a voter.
Anwar’s lawyer, N. Surendran, said his client’s lawsuit filed this morning at the Alor Setar High Court in Kedah represents “a major constitutional challenge upon the unfair delimitation of constituencies, which favours the ruling coalition”.
“This will be a test case for all other constituencies in the country where there has been malapportionment,” Surendran told the media in a statement.
Anwar’s lawsuit was filed together with PKR’s Lunas assemblyman Azman Nasrudin as an originating summons against the EC and the federal government.
In court papers sighted by Malay Mail Online, both Anwar and Azman sought a court order, namely a declaration that the redelineation of the Permatang Pauh and Sungai Petani parliamentary seats violates their rights as voters under the Federal Constitution’s Article 8(1).
Article 8(1) states that all individuals are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.
In Azman’s affidavit to support the lawsuit, he said the Sungai Petani seat where he is registered to vote had 93,176 registered voters during Election 2013, which rose to 101,219 registered voters during the second quarter this year.
Both Anwar and Azman compared the figures in the two PKR-held seats with the number of registered voters during the same periods in 12 other constituencies: Lipis, Gerik, Lenggong, Padang Rengas, Kuala Kangsar, Parit, Bagan Datok, Labis, Sembrong, Pengerang, Padang Terap and Sik.
The 12 other federal seats are all held by the ruling Umno, except for Labis that is held by the allied MCA, with the difference in number of registered voters during those two periods ranging from over 1,500 to slightly over 4,400.
Both of them jointly claimed that the difference in the total voters between their two constituencies and other constituencies “amount to malapportionment arising from the improper and / or unlawful delimitation” of the constituencies and violates their rights under Article 8(1).
“The malapportionment exists whether the figures during the 13th General Election or Second quarter of 2017 is relied upon,” they claimed.