Court of Appeal: Jais’ land grab for ‘mega mosque’ illegal…

Lawyer Rosli Dahlan had previously urged the court to prevent the religious authorities from trying “to rob in the name of God”.

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/01/17/court-acquisition-of-26-acre-land-for-mosque-unlawful/

..

za.jpg

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/jais-land-grab-for-mega-mosque-illegal-appellate-court-declares?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

..

14 April 2017

 

Replying to

The grounds of the judgment had declared Jais’ acquisition of United Allied Empire’s land as unlawful, invalid, and done in bad faith.

zs.jpg

..

17 Jan 2017

Jais’ land grab for ‘mega mosque’ illegal, appellate court declares

By Ida Lim

PUTRAJAYA, Jan 17 — In a landmark ruling today, the Court of Appeal declared the Selangor Islamic Religious Department’s (Jais) compulsory acquisition of a private company’s 26-acre land to build a purported “mega mosque” as unlawful and invalid.

Lawyer Rosli Dahlan, who represented the private landowner United Allied Empire Sdn Bhd (UAE) that had accused the Selangor Islamic body of abuse of power for the alleged land grab, said today’s ruling meant that the land will have to be returned to his client.

“The Court of Appeal has declared the acquisition of 26 acres to build a mosque as an illegal acquisition; it is mala fide, it is not genuine,” he told reporters when met here after the decision was delivered, using the legal term for “in bad faith”.

Landmark ruling

Rosli said today’s court decision was also a “landmark” ruling which effectively enhanced the protection of landowners’ rights in Malaysia, by clarifying the procedural requirements and process in law that public bodies must fulfill before forcibly acquiring private land.

“The Court of Appeal strengthened the right of landowners by insisting on Form A and Form K to be construed in accordance with the Land Acquisition Act,” he said.

The Selangor authorities had previously admitted failure to issue the Form A — a public notice to notify that the land will be acquired and the very first step in a compulsory acquisition process — for the UAE land. They had also failed to show documentary evidence in court that they had registered the required changes in land title records after issuing Form K, which is a notice of formal possession of the acquired land.

“It (today’s decision) has a wide implication because in the past, the PTDs (District Land Administrators) and PTGs (Land and Mines Directors) just bypass the requirement to gazette Form A. Now this court says that is a mandatory requirement.

“Secondly on Form K, that Form K does not shut the door to landowners,” Rosli said

He said the court’s ruling today that the issuing of Form K alone does not end the landowners’ rights to pursue a challenge against a land acquisition departed from the landmark 2014 land case of Ishmael Lim Abdullah.

The issue of Form K’s effect was crucial to determine if UAE still had the legal standing to continue with its lawsuit, with UAE’s lawyers having argued that a landowner’s’ rights will only end after the endorsement of memorial or the recording of the state’s rights over the acquired land.
.

The Court of Appeal panel today ruled in favor of UAE as it found that the Selangor Islamic authorities had failed to comply with the land acquisition process, also granting all 24 reliefs that the private company had sought — including a court order compelling the Selangor bodies to declare their actual intention for acquiring the massive plot of land in Selangor’s Bestari Jaya.

– See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/jais-land-grab-for-mega-mosque-illegal-appellate-court-declares?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#sthash.zgcc8Mw0.dpuf

  • Court: Acquisition of 26-acre land for mosque unlawful

    PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today ruled that the acquisition of a 26-acre piece of land belonging to a developer for the construction of a mosque in Batang Berjuntai, Selangor was illegal.

    A three-man bench chaired by Justice Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim said the High Court failed to appreciate the evidence before it and made erroneous findings of fact and law.

    “This is a fit and proper case for appellate intervention when the findings and judgment by the High Court is not supported by evidence and in fact contradicted the evidence,” Abang Iskandar said in allowing the appeal by United Allied Empire Sdn Bhd (UAE).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment