Who did they ask in Malaysia? Is there a 1MalaysiaPenis? Whose penis did they consider Malay, Chinese, India, Sikh, Orang Asli, Iban, Bidayuh, Orang Ulu, Melanau…?
..
2. Meanwhile, Ecuador tops the list with an average penis length of 17.6cm when erect, while Cambodia came in last at 10cm.
Lawyer confirms case against Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim for claims of selective prosecution
Updated 4 hours ago · Published on 03 Mar 2023 3:53PM
KUALA LUMPUR – Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has filed a defamation suit against Pendang MP Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim this afternoon.
Anwar’s lawyer Datuk S. N. Nair confirmed this to Bernama, saying the suit was filed at 12.06pm today.
Among the claims are general damages and an injunction against Awang from publishing the said or any similar defamatory words.
On February 22, The Vibes reported that Awang had three days to apologise for his alleged defamatory comments made to the press outside Parliament, which accused the prime minister of selective prosecution that was allegedly worse than when former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was in power.
The letter of demand also cited Awang’s statements which claimed that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) prosecution of former Bersatu information chief Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan, who is charged for receiving RM6.9 million in bribes, is the beginning of Anwar’s “games”.
Two days later Anwar sent Awang another letter of demand – this time over alleged defamatory comments in a TikTok video.
According to the letter of demand sighted by The Vibes, it referred to a video uploaded by TikTok user @asriasri64chanel containing footage of Awang speaking to reporters at the Dewan Rakyat lobby on February 21.
In the video uploaded a day after Awang spoke to the press, the Pendang MP told reporters that Anwar was appointed prime minister by illegal means.
In the demand letter, Anwar’s lawyers reminded Awang that the king had exercised his constitutional powers legally when appointing Anwar as prime minister, warning that his comments could be construed as questioning the monarch’s wisdom.
A chemical plant in china's Anhui caught fire followed by many huge explosions. Highly toxic smoke filled the air across cities & contaminated nearly water sources. pic.twitter.com/YHm8R4m3qL
A chemical plant in communist #china's Anhui caught fire followed by many huge explosions. Highly toxic smoke filled the air across cities & contaminated nearly water sources. CCP bottom feeding mouthpiece proudly claimed "everything is ok". #2023AnhuiChernobylpic.twitter.com/wrf56273Gp
considering the number of tweets on the Ohio chemical disaster by Comrade @HuXijin_GT, Comrade @chenweihua and other Chinese state media types, did any of them show any concern for the wellbeing of their fellow countrymen after the explosion at an Anhui pesticide plant yesterday? https://t.co/COabwC4FNt
Comrade Chen, China Daily's correspondent based in Brussels, managed to retweet a fire in Brooklyn New York but still haven't found time to care about explosion in his home country. Selfless and intrepid journalism! pic.twitter.com/l3vlwVIkoT
If you believe the lack of tweets for Anhui by Chinese state media is due to the relatively small impact, in 2018 a huge explosion at a Zhangjiakou chemical killed 23, and the comrades didn’t tweet about it either https://t.co/xUDL1RelnL
There is a long version apparently.. Ready to direct the Speaker to quote the meeting rules again? The Speaker did not have time to speak, he continued speaking. Speaker STOPPED him! He who doesn’t understand the meeting rules apparently – Is it true that MP Pendang has always been a joker like that?
Ada versi panjang rupanya.. 🤔 Siap boleh arah Speaker to quote peraturan mesyuarat lagi ? Tak sempat Speaker sebut, dia sambung berucap. Speaker STOPPED him ! Dia yg tak faham peraturan mesyuarat rupanya 🤔
Clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines initially excluded pregnant women due to safety concerns, and when the vaccines were authorized for emergency use, they were not recommended for this population. However, observational studies discovered that pregnant women infected with COVID-19 have higher risks of negative pregnancy and delivery outcomes compared to non-pregnant women, raising the question of the risks–benefits of administering COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women. By mid-2021, there was general consensus on the relative safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy; therefore, it is critical to investigate the safety issues related to these vaccines, considering the increasing acceptance among pregnant women. To address these concerns, we developed a research project to study the short-term effects and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination during the first trimester of pregnancy. Our research followed an observational retrospective design for 12 months from the beginning of the vaccination campaign, and included 124 cases of spontaneous abortions and 927 ongoing pregnancies. The odds of spontaneous abortion were non-significant for both versions of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer BNT162b2 AOR = 1.04, CI = 0.91–1.12; Moderna mRNA-1273 AOR = 1.02, CI = 0.89–1.08). Overall, our data indicated that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA COVID-19 immunization during the first trimester of pregnancy is commensurate with the predicted risk in non-vaccinated pregnant women. These findings contribute to the growing body of information regarding the safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. .
3. Results
During the study period, we identified a total of 3094 pregnancies with a first trimester presentation in the outpatient clinic, of which 927 had received at least one dose of mRNA vaccine. There were 124 (13.4%) cases of spontaneous abortions among those who received the COVID-19 vaccine, and 271 (12.5%) spontaneous abortions identified in pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 infection (p-value = 0.506) (Table 1). The average age of women who decided to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2 during their first trimester of pregnancy was significantly lower than those who refused (29.5 years vs. 31.6 years, p-value < 0.001). However, in the first group, there were significantly more infections with SARS-CoV-2 before pregnancy (15.9% vs. 8.9%, p-value < 0.001).
.
5. Conclusions
This study determined that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA COVID-19 immunization during the first trimester of pregnancy is similar to the risk in non-vaccinated pregnant women. These findings contribute to the growing body of information regarding the safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.
