Sudhir Thomas Vadaketh, The Battle Over Lee Kuan Yew’s Last Will (E-book)

..

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02WrrW3SCUhhcy9rXu9N1qYEEVF33mbtaoazLA3PwxeFqPWgHpnp4s9Sd5GffrXMYKl&id=688375943&mibextid=Nif5oz

Thank you, TODAY, for updating your piece to include my response to what some politicians claim.

“In response to TODAY’s queries, Mr Vadaketh said that the e-book is the product of a year of research by a team of researchers and himself and is “exhaustively footnoted”.

It does not include any primary interviews, said Mr Vadaketh, as he did not want to interview only a select few family members, which he believes would be a biased approach.

“Instead, it is based almost entirely on the compilation of affidavits, pleadings, formal documents and submissions from the Law Society of Singapore versus Lee Suet Fern case, which is rich source material,” he said.

Mr Vadaketh added that the Supreme Court had approved his request to access the case file for work on the book.

Any citizen who wishes to access the source material, which was referenced throughout, can make an application through the Supreme Court, he said.

Mr Vadaketh said that his main conclusions based on the available evidence were that:

Mr Lee Kuan Yew wanted his entire house at 38 Oxley Road demolished — nothing else — but he was aware that it might not be.

Madam Ho Ching and Mrs Lee Suet Fern, Lee Kuan Yew’s daughters-in-law, Ms Lee Wei Ling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang “have been unfairly judged in this matter by their respective public critics”

The formation and findings of the Ministerial Committee on 38 Oxley Road are, in Mr Vadaketh’s view, “problematic”

One point in Mr Teo’s parliamentary statement which Mr Vadaketh said was erroneous was that of the alleged lies under oath by Mrs Lee Suet Fern and Mr Lee Hsien Yang.

“I urge readers to go to pages 28 and 29 of my book, where I lay out clearly the Court of Three Judges’ findings, including the alleged inaccuracies offered by Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Suet Fern,” he said.

Another point in Mr Teo’s reply that Mr Vadaketh took issue with was regarding whether Mr Lee Kuan Yew wanted the Oxley house demolished and had included a clause on this in his last will.

Mr Vadaketh said that on page 20 of his book, he had stated clearly that there was no record of Mr Lee Kuan Yew having asked anybody for the demolition clause to be reinserted in the seventh and last will.

“Also, at no point do I say that Lee Suet Fern advised Lee Kuan Yew about reinserting the Demolition Clause,” he said.

However, Mr Vadaketh said that Ms Lee Wei Ling, who was the only child living with Mr Lee Kuan Yew, had sent an email on Dec 16, 2013, saying “Papa says go back to 2011 will”.

This refers to the first will which includes the Demolition Clause, said Mr Vadaketh, adding that this was on pages 35 and 70 of his book.”

..

E-book on Lee Kuan Yew’s will contains inaccuracies ‘calculated to mislead’ and ‘completely at odds’ with court findings: SM Teo

Charlene Goh

02 Mar 2023 05:35PM (Updated: 02 Mar 2023 06:58PM)

SINGAPORE: An e-book titled The Battle Over Lee Kuan Yew’s Last Will contains several inaccuracies “calculated to mislead” and that are “completely at odds” with court findings, Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security Teo Chee Hean said on Thursday (Mar 2).

The e-book, written by local author Sudhir Thomas Vadaketh and published in July last year, is about the debate over the late prime minister’s will and home at 38 Oxley Road, which led to disciplinary proceedings against Mrs Lee Suet Fern, the wife of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s son Lee Hsien Yang. 

The examination of the case against Mrs Lee was done by the Court of Three Judges (C3J), the highest disciplinary body for the legal profession, in November 2020 and a Disciplinary Tribunal (DT) in February 2020. She was found guilty of professional misconduct.

“The book is not credible, as it totally ignores the facts and findings which had been established, after an objective and thorough examination of the case,” said Mr Teo, who was the chair of a Ministerial Committee that had been set up to look into what should be done with the property after Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s death. 

“It is clear that the assertions in his book are calculated to mislead, as they are completely at odds with the findings and conclusions of the Court of Three Judges and the Disciplinary Tribunal,” he added.
.

INACCURACIES IN THE BOOK

In his answer to Mr Zhulkarnain’s question, Mr Teo laid out several examples of inaccuracies in the book:

What the courts found

  • In his book, Mr Vadaketh wrote that they have been “cleared of all suspicion of improper motives or manipulations vis-a-vis Mr Lee Kuan Yew and his will”.
  • But the Court of Three Judges and Disciplinary Tribunal in fact said otherwise, that the pair have not been cleared of all impropriety and had lied under oath and acted dishonestly.

On whether Mrs Lee made an “innocent mistake”

  • Mr Vadaketh wrote that Mrs Lee made an “innocent mistake” in sending Mr Lee Kuan Yew a different version of the will.
  • But the Court of Three Judges and the Disciplinary Tribunal had found that she had acted with “complete disregard” for Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s interests, Mr Teo noted.
  • Mr Teo said: “This was improper, unacceptable, and grossly negligent – it was no innocent mistake.”

.
On Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will

  • Mr Vadaketh wrote that Mr Lee Kuan Yew signed the will that he wanted to sign.
  • But the Court of Three Judges and Disciplinary Tribunal found that he signed a will which was not what he had wished to sign.
  • He did so as he was misled by Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Mrs Lee, Mr Teo noted.


.
For more:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ebook-lee-kuan-yew-will-inaccuracies-sudhir-thomas-vadaketh-3318711

..

E-book on Lee Kuan Yew’s will contains inaccuracies ‘calculated to mislead’ and ‘completely at odds’ with court findings: SM Teo

By Charlene Goh

Published March 2, 2023
Updated March 2, 2023

  • An e-book titled The Battle Over Lee Kuan Yew’s Last Will contains several inaccuracies “calculated to mislead” readers, Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean said
  • He also said that the inaccuracies are “completely at odds” with court findings
  • This was a response to a parliamentary question by Member of Parliament Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim
  • Mr Zhulkarnain asked whether the book accurately represents the circumstances surrounding the signing of former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew’s will

.
Mr Teo, who is also Coordinating Minister for National Security and chair of a ministerial committee that had been set up to look into what should be done with the property after Lee Kuan Yew’s death, said: “The book is not credible, as it totally ignores the facts and findings which had been established, after an objective and thorough examination of the case.” 
.

He added: “It is clear that the assertions in his book are calculated to mislead, as they are completely at odds with the findings and conclusions of the Court of Three Judges and the disciplinary tribunal.”

Mr Teo was giving a written response to Member of Parliament Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim for Chua Chu Kang Group Representation Constituency, who had asked a parliamentary question on whether the book accurately represents the circumstances surrounding the signing of the late former prime minister’s will.

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/e-book-lee-kuan-yews-will-contains-inaccuracies-calculated-mislead-and-completely-odds-court-findings-sm-teo-2120541?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

..

Advertisement
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s