..
One dubious case out of billions of vaccinated people. Now compare to the much more common cases of encephalitis caused by the virus that the vax is highly protective against.https://t.co/AAStCTxMsv
— Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M. 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 (@JonathanSarfat1) October 2, 2022
Re: "the top journal "Vaccines""
— Atomsk's Sanakan (@AtomsksSanakan) October 2, 2022
Nope. It's retracted vaccine denialist tripe, + is from the notorious publisher MDPI that's had nonsense in other journals.https://t.co/Uc6DfruyOEhttps://t.co/ifjXyg6KGThttps://t.co/HS3ymvtIajhttps://t.co/hVhNgjEOGDhttps://t.co/kWhGdBqTMH pic.twitter.com/rfkOmBnpHG
..
The BMJ is ranked 4th. That's top. Vaccines is 4097. 😂 https://t.co/2SyAhCu4nQ
— simonthong aka kitty poo (@KittyPo80176717) October 2, 2022
..
Vaccines is not a "top journal". Nowhere close.
— BowTiedShrike (@BowTiedShrike) October 2, 2022
Issues w/the paper: no controls shown on Ab staining. Lots of other issues with this patient.
Overstates conclusions (detection, even if real, does not prove a causal relationship) https://t.co/HLjtxhSzaH
..
Nope. 4th tier. The current game is to look at every journal in existence, include the 3/4 that no one in their right mind publishes in, and then say 'we're in the top quintile'.
— BowTiedShrike (@BowTiedShrike) October 2, 2022
Jump down to "Ranking Journals" for more explanation: https://t.co/MQLieIfNSt
..
weehingthong 