British Medical Journal urges New York Times to correct a report about the UK allegedly okaying "mix & match" vaccines. Story alleged if someone got a 1st shot from one maker but that type was no longer available, the 2nd could come from a different maker https://t.co/gFcVsOMkzd

— delthia ricks 🔬 (@DelthiaRicks) January 3, 2021

UK's 'mix and match' of Pfizer and Oxford vaccine policy reminds me of my mum.

Nurse: You already had half a jar of Pfizer Nutella; we don't have any left but we'll give you this Oxford version (picture below) – they're all the same really.

Me: NO THEY'RE NOT pic.twitter.com/BZanBzo854

— Ghaith Aljayyoussi (@PKghaith) January 4, 2021

Britain will allow for a mix-and-match vaccine regimen: If a second dose of the vaccine a patient originally received isn’t available, another vaccine may be substituted, British health officials said. The new guidance contradicts guidelines in the U.S. https://t.co/bQv9rC3eTO

— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 1, 2021

Analysis: is it wise for England to mix and match Covid vaccines? https://t.co/enzks16oxr

— Eirini Zarkadoula (@ezarkadoula) January 4, 2021